Saturday, March 28, 2026

Review of The Sixth Extinction: An Unnatural History by Elizabeth Kolbert

This book review was written by Eugene Kernes   

Book can be found in: 
Genre = Science
Book Club Event = Book List (03/28/2026)
Intriguing Connections = 1) Earth's Flora and Fauna, 2) The Evolution of Evolution,


Watch Short Review

Excerpts

“No creature has ever altered life on the planet in this way before, and yet other, comparable events have occurred.  Very, very occasionally in the distant past, the planet has undergone change so wrenching that the diversity of life has plummeted.  Five of these ancient events were catastrophic enough that they’re put in their own category: the so-called Big Five.  In what seems like a fantastic coincidence, but is probably no coincidence at all, the history of these events is recovered just as people come to realize that they are causing another one.  When it is still too early to say whether it will reach the proportions of the Big Five, it becomes known as the Sixth Extinction.” – Elizabeth Kolbert, Prologue, Page 9

 

“Whatever the explanation, the contrasting fate of the two groups raises a key point.  Everything (and everyone) alive today is descended from an organism that somehow survived the impact.  But it does not follow from this that they (or we) are any better adapted.  In times of extreme stress, the whole concept of fitness, at least in a Darwinian sense, loses its meaning: how could a creature be adapted, either well or ill, for conditions it has never before encountered in its entire evolutionary history?” – Elizabeth Kolbert, Chapter IV: The Luck of the Ammonites, Page 84

 

“WHY is ocean acidification so dangerous?  The question is tough to answer only because the list of reasons is so long.  Depending on how tightly organisms are able to regulate their internal chemistry, acidification may affect such basic processes as metabolism, enzyme activity, and protein function.  Because it will change the makeup of microbial communities, it will alter the availability of key nutrients, like iron and nitrogen.  For similar reasons, it will change the amount of light that passes through the water, and for somewhat different reasons, it will alter the way sound propagates.  (In general, acidification is expected to make the seas noisier.)  It seems likely to promote the growth of toxic algae.  It will impact photosynthesis – many plant species are apt to benefit from elevated CO2 levels – and it will alter the compounds formed by dissolved metals, in some cases in ways that could be poisonous.” – Elizabeth Kolbert, Chapter VI: The Sea Around Us, Pages 109-110


Review

Is This An Overview?

Evolution enables biodiversity, but not all species can compete.  Sometimes species disappear, go extinct.  A mass extinction is when there is a significant loss in biodiversity.  Before the rise of humans, the world has experienced mass extinctions.  There have been five such extinctions eras.  Just as humans begin to discover that extinctions are possible, humans discover that they are the cause of another.  The sixth extinction is caused by mostly human activity. 

 

Humans have terraformed the world beyond what many species are capable of adapting to.  Evolutionary fitness becomes meaningless in an era that is experiencing a quickly changing environment.  Some species can benefit within the changed land, air, and water, but often at the expense of many other species.  As humans have harmed the ecosystem, humans are also capable of saving the ecosystem.  Various groups have formed to protect the ecosystem, but these protection efforts are limited for the humans might not know how to properly take care of a species, and the species can become dependent on human protection. 

 

Caveats?

Each chapter is about an extinct or going extinct species, but not necessarily because of human interaction or uniquely human intention.  Which is in contrast to title of the book.  There is not much information about the causes of the general mass extinction.  Various details are provided that add to the length of the book, but do not provide relevant scientific information. 

 

 


Questions to Consider while Reading the Book

•What is the raison d’etre of the book?  For what purpose did the author write the book?  Why do people read this book?
•What are some limitations of the book?
•To whom would you suggest this book?
•Why the ‘Sixth’ Extinction? 
•What is the difference between a regular extinction and a mass extinction? 
•How did the idea of extinction evolve?
•How can evolution become meaningless?  
•How did dinosaurs go extinct? 
•What is the Anthropocene era?
•How to prevent frog extinction?
•How do plankton effect the ecosystem?  
•What can happen when oceans become acidic? 
•What happens to tropical reefs when temperatures rise?
•What species lives that has not adapted to variations in temperature?
•What happened to the Neanderthals? 
•Why are bats going extinct? 


Book Details
Edition:                   10th Anniversary Edition
Publisher:               Holt Paperbacks [Henry Holt and Company]
Edition ISBN:         9780805099799
Pages to read:          244
Publication:             2014
1st Edition:              2024
Format:                    eBook 

Ratings out of 5:
Readability    4
Content          3
Overall          3






Wednesday, March 11, 2026

Review of Nonzero: The Logic of Human Destiny by Robert Wright

This book review was written by Eugene Kernes   

Book can be found in: 
Genre = Sociology
Book Club Event = Book List (03/21/2026)
Intriguing Connections = 1) To Cooperate Or To Defect?, 2) The Strategies Of Game Theory


Watch Short Review

Excerpts

“Still, data are often of little or no cost and great benefit; swapping them is one of the oldest forms of non-zero-sum interaction.  People by their nature come together to constitute a social information processing system and thus reap positive sums.  The fandango, the academic conference, and the Internet are superficially different expressions of the same deep force.” – Robert Wright, Chapter Two: The Way We Were, Page 29



“The impetus gets even stronger when we add one more factor: our old friend from the previous chapter, war.  How would war encourage agriculture?  In primitive war, few things come in handier than sheer manpower.  And agriculture supports much larger settlements than hunting and gathering does.  One of the earliest known farm towns, the ancient, excavated village of Jericho, housed hundreds of people on around six acres.  Not huge by modern urban standards, but compare it to what lies beneath: remnants of a hunter-gatherer camp one-fifth as large.  Imagine a battle between these two villages, and you’ll see that farming was a compelling lifestyle.  Whether or not early farmers thought about the military edge their lifestyle offered, war would have helped the lifestyle spread.” – Robert Wright, Chapter Six: The Inevitability of Agriculture, Page 88


“That brings us to the second source of chiefly demise: popular discontent.  One of the great misunderstandings about evolved human nature is that people are sheep; that, because we evolved amid social hierarchy (true), we are designed to slavishly accept low status and blindly follow the leader (false).  People by nature seek the highest status they can attain, under the circumstances, and they accept leadership only so long as it seems to serve their interest.  When it doesn’t, they start to grumble.” – Robert Wright, Chapter Seven: The Age of Chiefdoms, Page 99



Review

Is This An Overview?

Different people are motivated to cooperate, when each benefit from the interaction.  A nonzero sum outcome, a positive sum interaction.  There is more to gain from cooperation than not cooperating.  People can also cooperate to avoid negative sum interactions, in which all who interact lose.  Nonzero interactions can motivate cooperation, but that does not mean that cooperation is without conflict.  The division of benefits and the effort of individuals can be a motivator for conflict.  What creates friction and disables cooperation are zero-sum interactions.  Zero-sum interactions require someone to benefit at the expense of another’s loss.  What someone loses, another gains.

 

Sharing information is a non-zero-sum interaction, for sharing costs little to the sharer but benefits others.  Communities form to share information to enable members to benefit from other people’s information.  Commerce fosters tolerance of other peoples, as the other peoples are or can become customers.  People accept hierarchies, when the hierarchies support the interests of the people.  When leaders exploit the people, the people reject the hierarchies.  War motivates people to come together, for together the people can have a higher chance of defeating the threatening rival than should they fight alone. 

 

Caveats?

This book is based on many examples.  The examples are diverse, and do express the concept of nonzero.  But the concept itself is explained quickly.  The concept is derived from game theory, but no background information in game theory is needed.  This book serves as a validation of the idea.  


Questions to Consider while Reading the Book

•What is the raison d’etre of the book?  For what purpose did the author write the book?  Why do people read this book?
•What are some limitations of the book?
•To whom would you suggest this book?
•What is nonzero sum?
•What are conflicts that arise from cooperation? 
•What is free riding?
•What is social status?
•What is destiny? 
•What are cultures?  
•Is there a cultural hierarchy? 
•What are the tools of racism? 
•Why do hunter-gatherers share food?
•Why share information? 
•How did information technology share society?
•What leads to economic development?  What does not lead to economic development?
•Is war zero-sum or nonzero-sum?
•Why wage peace?
•Why did communities transition to agriculture? 
•Why support a hierarchy?
•How did writing affect societies?  
•What is the effect of barbarians? 
•Why are some ideas more likely to be reborn should they be extinguished?
•What is the effect of competitors?  
•What is the effect of commerce? 

Book Details
Publisher:               Pantheon Books [Random House]
Edition ISBN:         9780375727818
Pages to read:          382
Publication:             2001
1st Edition:              2001
Format:                    eBook 

Ratings out of 5:
Readability    4
Content          3
Overall          3






Wednesday, March 4, 2026

Review of Animal Farm by George Orwell

This book review was written by Eugene Kernes   

Book can be found in: 
Genre = Novel
Book Club Event = Book List (10/03/2026)


Watch Short Review

Excerpts

“”Man is the only creature that consumes without producing.  He does not give milk, he does not lay eggs, he is too weak to pull the plough, he cannot run fast enough to catch rabbits.  Yet he is lord of all the animals.  He sets them to work, he gives back to them the bare minimum that will prevent them from starving, and the rest he keeps for himself.  Our labour tills the soil, our dung fertilizes it, and yet there is not one of us that owns more than his bare skin.”” – George Orwell, Chapter 1, Page 8


“However, these stories were never fully believed.  Rumours of a wonderful farm, where the human beings had been turned out and the animals managed their own affairs, continued to circulate in vague and distorted forms, and throughout that year a wave of rebelliousness ran through the countryside.  Bulls which had always been tractable suddenly turned savage, sheep broke down hedges and devoured the clover, cows kicked the pail over, hunters refused their fences and shot their riders on to the other side.” – George Orwell, Chapter 4, Page 34


“All that year the animals worked like slaves.  But they were happy in their work; they grudged no effort or sacrifice, well aware that everything that they did was for the benefit of themselves and those of their kind who would come after them, and not for a pack of idle, thieving human beings.” – George Orwell, Chapter 6, Page 51


Review

Is This An Overview?

The animals of Manor Farm are the proletariat, the exploited workers.  What keeps them in oppression are humans, who do nothing but take, while ruling over the other animals.  Inspired by a speech of a future without exploitation, a future where animals are free and are equal, the animals prepare themselves for a revolution.  At an opportune moment, without planning, the animals take control of the farm, and turn the farm into Animal Farm.  Laws are distilled into Seven Commandments, that separate humans and other animals, meant to prevent animals from becoming like humans. 

 

Although equals, the pigs are recognized as the thinkers, who can manage Animal Farm.  But the other animals notice that the pigs get extra favors.  All is explained to be to the benefit of the animals, and that the pigs are the ones suffering.  One pig even manages to monopolies power, with other pigs submitting to the pig.  Gradually, the pigs distort the Commandments.  Little by little, the animals lose their rights, lose their freedoms.  Even as they think it’s for their benefit, even as their conditions become worse than under the reign of humans.  What happens to the animals of Animal Farm?

 

Caveats?

Although the setting is in England, the book is about Soviet Russia.  To understand the references, would require background information.  As a theme of the book is about manipulating information, the reader has to trust and mistrust the information provided. 


Questions to Consider while Reading the Book

•What is the raison d’etre of the book?  For what purpose did the author write the book?  Why do people read this book?
•What are some limitations of the book?
•To whom would you suggest this book?
•Who is Mr. Jones?
•What is Manor Farm?
•Who is Old Major?
•What did Old Major’s speech promise?
•What do animals think of humans?
•What is the reference to four and two legs?
•How is the song, ‘Beasts of England’, used?
•What is Squealer capable of?
•What is Animalism? 
•When and how did the Rebellion take place?
•What does clothing represent?
•What is the farmhouse supposed to be used for? 
•What are the Seven Commandments?
•What happens to the Commandents?
•How did the animals think about work after the Rebellion?
•What happened to the milk?
•For what reason do the pigs get more than other animals?
•What is the situation between Pinchfield and Frederick? 
•What did other people and animals think of Animal Farm? 
•Where did the dogs come from? 
•What happened to the pigs who disagreed with Napoleon? 
•What happened to the windmill? 
•What happened to equality? 
•Who is Snowball?
•Who is Napoleon? 
•What happened to Boxer?
•Who is Benjamin? 
•What happed to Mollie? 

Book Details
Edition:                   First Edition
Publisher:               1st World Library
Edition ISBN:         9781595404299
Pages to read:          109
Publication:             2004
1st Edition:              1945
Format:                    Paperback 

Ratings out of 5:
Readability    5
Content          4
Overall          5







Sunday, March 1, 2026

Review of The Trial of Donald H. Rumsfeld by William Cooper

This book review was written by Eugene Kernes   

Book can be found in: 
Genre = Novel
Intriguing Connections = 1) When Intelligence Goes Wrong


Watch Short Review

Excerpts

“The experience taught Rummy a searing lesson he would internalize deeply: showing weakness strengthens one’s opponent.  He’d sharpened this formulation over the years into one of his most frequently uttered sentences: weakness is provocative.” – William Cooper, Chapter 5: September 22, 1975, Page 45


“A few blocks from Cheney’s office, Paul O’Neill was watching alone in his office in his luxurious Washington D.C. apartment.  The room was hazy with smoke from his cigar.  A tall glass of gin rested in his right hand.  Bush had fired O’Neill months earlier, on Cheney’s prodding.  As Cheney said to Rummy after he was canned, O’Neill’s brain only helped if he was on board, if their interests were aligned.  “We don’t want our adversaries to be smart and energetic.  We want them dumb and lazy.”” – William Cooper, Chapter 25: February 5, 2006, Page 132


“Rummy paused.  Again, about half the Republicans stood and clapped.  Everyone else remained seated.  Rummy made a mental note to have Jenkins create a list of all Republicans who weren’t standing during the ovations.  There would be consequences.  The Republicans needed to be unified behind their president or they would get walloped at the polls.  He knew there was disagreement within the party about going into Iran, but these disagreements were for behind closed doors.  He focused on not letting his face show his displeasure.” – William Cooper, Chapter 44: August 26, 2005, Page 180


Review

Is This An Overview?

Intelligence and intention do not necessarily produce quality decisions.  Intelligence and intention can also produce justifications for one’s own ideas, even to contradictory evidence.  This led Donald H. Rumsfeld, known as Rummy, to withhold information that had dire consequences.  Rummy’s often expressed view, is that weakness if provocative.  But the show of strength, creates antagonists.  To overcome a weakness, to cover up for weakness, decisions are made to compensate with a greater show of strength, which further exacerbates the situation. 

 

To defend America, Rummy needed America to go to war.  To justify the war, information was manipulated.  War that cost innocents their lives, while being told that that war is for the good of America.  A war meant to provide stability and democracy to the region attacked.  As opposition mounts, the international community learns that the war need not have happened, and use the International Court to make the case.  Rummy is put on trial.  What is the outcome of the trial?

 

Caveats?

This book uses a mix of real references, real events, real people, but with many fictional details and events.  Meant to make prominent certain political information, that can have dire consequences.  The difficulty is understanding what information is real, and which is fiction.  Some events are clearly identifiable, but others require background information.  The characters are based on real people, who made decisions that are detrimental to the American people, but are not turned into caricatures.


Questions to Consider while Reading the Book

•What is the raison d’etre of the book?  For what purpose did the author write the book?  Why do people read this book?
•What are some limitations of the book?
•To whom would you suggest this book?
•Who is the narrator? 
•Who is Donald H. Rumsfeld (Rummy)?
•Why is Rumsfeld on trial?
•Why did Rumsfeld not inform President Bush of the tape?
•What are the different epistemological categories? 
•How did Joyce effect Rumsfeld? 
•How did Rumsfeld and Nixon interact? 
•For Rumsfeld, why is weakness provocative? 
•What did Rumsfeld do with Searle?
•Why did Rumsfeld want to join Bush? 
•What was the conflict between Rumsfeld and the generals? 
•What did Rumsfeld think of reporters?
•Can there be proof of something that does not exist? 
•What measures does Rumsfeld take to find out if Iraq has WMD?
•What did Rumsfeld think of Clinton?
•What did Rumsfeld do during 9/11?
•What was Bush’s stance on Iraq?
•Why was Iraq chosen as the target? 
•Who is Richard B. Cheney?
•Who is Paul O’Neill?
•What did O’Neill give Suskind?
•What did Rumsfeld learn from Charles Darwin?
•What is catastrophic success?
•What happened in the war against Iraq?
•Who is Condoleezza Rice?
•Why was Rumsfeld interested in Iran? 
•Why did Cheney become President?
•Who Became president after Cheney? 
•How did Rumsfeld treat allies? 
•What happened with Iran? 
•What is the International Criminal Court and what power does it have?
•What did President Trump think of Rumsfeld? 

Book Details
This book was provided to the reviewer by the author
Publisher:               Laughing Nuisance Productions
Edition ISBN:         9798999902900
Pages to read:          281
Publication:             2025
1st Edition:              2025
Format:                    Paperback 

Ratings out of 5:
Readability    5
Content          4
Overall          4







Thursday, February 19, 2026

Review of The God That Failed Edited By Richard H. Crossman

This book review was written by Eugene Kernes   

Book can be found in: 
Genre = Economics
Book Club Event = Book List (02/21/2026)


Watch Short Review

Excerpts

“Gradually I learned to distrust my mechanistic preoccupation with facts and to regard the world around me in the light of dialectic interpretation.  It was a satisfactory and indeed blissful state; once you had assimilated the technique you were no longer disturbed by facts; they automatically took on the proper color and fell into their proper place.  Both morally and logically the Party was infallible: morally, because the aims were right, that is, in accord with the Dialectic of History, and these aims justified all means; logically, because the Party was the vanguard of the Proletariat, and the Proletariat the embodiment of the active principle in History.” – Arthur Koestler, Page 34


“Besides internal differences resulting from its own heterogeneous composition, the Communist International felt the repercussions of every difficulty of the Soviet State.  After Lenin’s death, it was clear that the Soviet State could not avoid what seems to be the destiny of every dictatorship: the gradual and inexorable narrowing of its political pyramid.  The Russian Communist Party, which had suppressed all rival parties and abolished any possibility of general political discussion in the Soviet assemblies, itself suffered a similar fate, and its member’s political views were rapidly ousted by the policy of the Party machine.  From that moment, every difference of opinion in the controlling body was destined to end in the physical extinction of the minority.  The Revolution, which had extinguished its enemies, began to devour its favorite sons.  The thirsty gods gave no more truce.” – Ignazio Silone, Pages 105-106


“Although the long-heralded Dictatorship of the Proletariat has not materialized, there is nevertheless dictatorship of one kind – dictatorship of the Soviet bureaucracy.  It is essential to recognize this and not to allow oneself to be bamboozled.  This is not what was hoped for – one might almost say that it is precisely the last thing in the world that was hoped.  The workers have no longer even the liberty of electing their own representatives to defend their threatened interests.  Free ballot – open or secret – is a derision and a sham; the voters have merely the right of electing those who have been chosen for them beforehand.  The workers are cheated, muzzled and bound hand and foot, so that resistance has become well-nigh impossible.  The game has been well played by Stalin, and Communists the whole world over applaud him, believing that in the Soviet Union at least they have gained a glorious victory, and they call all those who do not agree with them public enemies and traitors.” – AndrĂ© Gide, Pages 184-185


Review

Is This An Overview?

This is a collection of six essays, six individuals, six perspectives on the Russian Communist Party during 1910s to 1940s.  An explanation of how each wanted communism to succeed, but were disillusioned.  Each was drawn into communism for the ideals, and each disillusioned by what happened.  An organized economic system meant to develop society, but had the effect of harming the people claimed to be helped.  These are memoirs of how communism affected the people. 

 

Members of a Communist political party, defer to the party for answers, for decisions.  Facts and morality do not affect decisions made for the party is deemed logically and morally infallible.  The party was at the vanguard of the Proletariat, who were justified by the dialectic interpretation of history.  While ideally, decisions are to be made after a discussion with the members.  In practice, the decisions are delivered from the leaders to everyone else without consultation of anyone else.  Once the party leaders made a decision, any criticism of the decision became a form of sabotage.  After the Communists suppressed all rival political opponents, the members of the Communist Party were also suppressed.  Every difference of opinion became a means of removing the minority. 

 

Building a better future that was without conflict was an idealized goal to the Communist Party, and the people were willing to contribute material and spiritual sacrifices to build that future.  The sacrifice of the individual and freedom for the collective good.  In practice, the sacrifices made the conditions worse than under Imperial Russia.  The Communist Part brought back serfdom and slavery.  The proletariat, the workers, were no longer exploited by Capitalists, but were exploited by the Communists.  Exploited without the ability to resist.  Workers no longer had any ability to elect their own officials.  Effective propaganda kept the conditions of Russia hidden. 

 

Caveats?

The writing style has mixed quality due to the different writing approaches of the authors.  As these are memoirs about the impact of Russian communism, there is a lack of a systematic analysis of socialism. 

 

Although there is diversity in the authors perspectives, and their activities, there are also similarities.  Some praise and criticism of the Russian Communist Party were repetitive.  All 6 are commenting on Russian communism, not generally socialism.  All were commenting on the leadership of the communist party and the effects of the decisions, but none were in leadership positions that made the decisions. 


Questions to Consider while Reading the Book

•What is the raison d’etre of the book?  For what purpose did the author write the book?  Why do people read this book?
•What are some limitations of the book?
•To whom would you suggest this book?
•Why did people support (Russian) communism? 
•What is communism, socialism, and fascism? 
•What did the Bolsheviks do?
•What is a Soviet?
•What happened to Russian collectivization?
•What the did Communist Party think of Spanish fascism?
•What did the Communist Party think of Nazi party?
•What was McCarthyism?
•How did Communism effect and was affected by religion? 
•What is a proletariat? 
•What happens to employment under communism?
•What happens to alternative political party’s?
•What does a Communist Party consider sabotage? 
•How do Communist decisions get made?
•What is the difference between Capitalist and Socialist publishers? 
•What became of ‘intellectuals’?
•Why did Arthur Koestler join the Communist Party?
•What did the Communist party want from Koestler?
•What did the Communist Party think of Koestler’s book?
•How did Russian people treat foreigners? 
•Why did Ignazio Silone join the Communist Party?
•Why can the Italians accept an earthquake? 
•Why did Richard Wright join the Communist Party?
•What did the Communist Party think of race?
•What did Andre Gide think of the Communist Party?
•What are the benefits and consequences of conformity? 
•What did Louis Fischer think of the Communist Party?
•What is ‘Socialist realism’?
•When did the Bolshevik Revolution end? 
•What happens to freedom when property is transferred to government?
•What did Stephen Spender think of the Communist Party?
•What do Communists think about the death? 

Book Details
Forword Author:   David E. Engerman
Ancillary Foreword: Enid Starkie
Contributing Authors: Richard H. Crossman, Arthur Koestler, Ignazio Silone, Richard Wright, AndrĂ© Gide, Louis Fisher, Stephen Spender, 
Publisher:               Columbia University Press
Edition ISBN:         9780231123952
Pages to read:          298
Publication:             2001
1st Edition:              1950
Format:                    Paperback

Ratings out of 5:
Readability    4
Content          5
Overall          4